BDP-105

High resolution digital output module for universal and SACD players.
jhmkoop
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:45 am

BDP-105

Post by jhmkoop »

Is there any chance of a vanity module for the BDP-105
in the (near) future?

Regards

Joost
Karl W.
Posts: 28
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 12:27 pm

Re: BDP-105

Post by Karl W. »

It makes sense to me because you would then have the Vanity board feed by the linear power supply of the Oppo. Then there would be less need for something like Dr. Lee's power supply.
AP
Posts: 366
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 8:34 pm

Re: BDP-105

Post by AP »

Hi,
Implementing the Vanity module into BDP-105 should be feasible. Once we have BDP-103 or 105 (they share the same mainboard) on the desk we can tailor the firmware for this player family.

Best regard
Pavel
ALBERTYANG
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 5:29 am

Re: BDP-105

Post by ALBERTYANG »

Why don't you design an external vanity module.Could be connected to every player with HDMI.
kamenoff
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 12:36 am

Re: BDP-105

Post by kamenoff »

The question is do we need a Vanity board. JVB offer modification without Vanity board: http://www.jvbdigital.nl/jvb.asp?cur=2&level=sdi&page=title&title=876
AP
Posts: 366
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 8:34 pm

Re: BDP-105

Post by AP »

Hi Albert,
An external module with HDMI input and SPDIF outputs is a great idea and technically easy to make. In fact, we already have the HDMI interface as well as the the FIFO buffering implemented in our DAC already (will be announced soon). IMHO such a solution would not be justifiable against the HDMI licensing. Should you wish to discuss a different interpretation of this issue, please start a topic in the General talk section of this forum.
Thanks, Pavel
AP
Posts: 366
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 8:34 pm

Re: BDP-105

Post by AP »

Hi kamenoff,
I think that both Vanity and the JVB solution offer different features in terms of signal processing, number of channels and price. Please feel free to pick the solution that better fits your needs.

Pavel
Tip
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2013 9:25 pm

Re: BDP-105

Post by Tip »

Please see the topic "The Vanity module for BDP-103: Demand survey" under "General Discussion" -> "News & Announcements".

Tip
Karl W.
Posts: 28
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 12:27 pm

Re: BDP-105

Post by Karl W. »

kamenoff Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The question is do we need a Vanity board. JVB
> offer modification without Vanity board:
> http://www.jvbdigital.nl/jvb.asp?cur=2&level=sdi&p
> age=title&title=876


The Vanity board look to be of superior build than the original JVB board, much more so.
supersax
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2014 12:49 pm

Re: BDP-105

Post by supersax »

Hello Pavel,

My name is Dave and I am new to this board. I currently have a McCormack UDP-1 Deluxe (which I use for 2-channel only and really sounds wonderful, but is ~10-year-old digital technology) for my collection of >1200 CDs, DVD-As and SACDs. But instead of going the audio server route, I am exploring whether there is a device such as an Oppo 105 that could be used as a transport with an external DSD dac (I am also considering an Exasound dac). In another part of the forum, you previously stated that the system board in a 103 was the same as a system board in a 105, but with different firmware. Because of this, I was wondering if you are able to add a Vanity103HD to an Oppo 105? I would also go with the optional firmware with selectable SACD playback in DoP mode since I would be trying to replace my UDP-1. Thank you in advance for thoughts. BTW, I found this blog entry very interesting re: upgrading the power supply of a 103 vs. a 105:

http://www.modwright.com/blog/post.php?s=2013-01-28-oppo-103-mods-and-linear-power-supply-updates-for-103105

Dave
Post Reply